Monday, September 28

MC Escher

Maurits Cornelis Escher (Photo right) 17 June 1898 – 27 March 1972 was a Dutch graphic artist who made mathematically inspired woodcuts, lithographs, and mezzotints. Despite wide popular interest, Escher was for long somewhat neglected in the art world, even in his native Netherlands. He was 70 before a retrospective exhibition was held. In the twenty-first century, he became more widely appreciated, with exhibitions across the world.

His work features mathematical objects and operations including impossible objects, explorations of infinity, reflection, symmetry, perspective, truncated and stellated polyhedra, hyperbolic geometry, and tessellations. Although Escher believed he had no mathematical ability, he interacted with the mathematicians George Pólya, Roger Penrose, Harold Coxeter and crystallographer Friedrich Haag, and conducted his own research into tessellation.

Early in his career, he drew inspiration from nature, making studies of insects, landscapes, and plants such as lichens, all of which he used as details in his artworks. He traveled in Italy and Spain, sketching buildings, townscapes, architecture and the tilings of the Alhambra and the Mezquita of Cordoba, and became steadily more interested in their mathematical structure.

Escher's art became well known among scientists and mathematicians, and in popular culture, especially after it was featured by Martin Gardner in his April 1966 Mathematical Games column in Scientific American. Apart from being used in a variety of technical papers, his work has appeared on the covers of many books and albums. He was one of the major inspirations of Douglas Hofstadter's Pulitzer Prize-winning 1979 book Gödel, Escher, Bach.  SOURCE:  Wikipedia

Some of his illustrations below:














Sunday, September 27

DEMOCRATS AND CHRISTIANITY

ACCORDING TO THE PEW RESEARCH CENTER...

Religious beliefs among Democrats:

  • 69%        Buddhist
  • 44%        Catholic
  • 28%        Evangelical
  • 61%        Hindu
  • 80%        Black Protestants
  • 18%        Jehovah's Witness
  • 64%        Jewish
  • 40%        Mainline Protestant
  • 19%        Mormon
  • 62%        Muslim
  • 44%        Orthodox Christian
  • 54%        Unaffiliated

TO REVIEW CHART FOR YOUSELF, CLICK HERE...

Why am I posting this data?

Because,
our new Supreme Court Justice Nominee, Amy Barrett, is a CATHOLIC with 7 children, 2 of which are adopted, 1 has Down Syndrome...

AND,
I am worried that our DEMOCRATIC SENATORS will treat her worse than they treated Bret Kavanaugh, if that is even possible...


YOU DECIDE FOR YOURSELF...  SEE BELOW...


Alex Seitz-Wald (NBC) on September 26, 2020 wrote:
WASHINGTON — Democrats quickly coalesced around opposition to President Donald Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court on Saturday, painting the nominee as a threat to policies that Democrats favor.

One Democratic senator — Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal, who is a member of the Judiciary Committee — said he would not meet with Barrett, as is customary for members of the committee, in protest of Trump’s decision to rush ahead with the nomination so close to an election.

“I refuse to treat this process as legitimate and will not meet with Judge Barrett,” Blumenthal said in a statement.

Recent Supreme Court nominations have become increasingly partisan, and the decision by Republican leaders to press ahead with replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg only weeks before a presidential election is likely to make the process more contentious.


Meredith Deliso (ABC) on September 26, 2020 wrote:
Republican and Democratic leaders reacted largely along party lines to President Donald Trump's nomination on Saturday of a conservative federal judge to fill the seat left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Overwhelmingly, Republicans called Amy Coney Barrett a well-qualified candidate and pushed for a confirmation in the upcoming weeks. Democrats continued to criticize the timing, with some outright saying they wouldn't meet with the nominee...

Former Vice President Joe Biden, however, criticized Trump for moving ahead with the nomination so close to Election Day.

"The Senate should not act on this vacancy until after the American people select their next president and the next Congress," he said in a statement.

His running mate, Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., said that the next president must select the next justice.

"With the next Supreme Court Justice set to determine the fate of protections for those with preexisting health conditions, and reproductive health options, I will continue to fight on behalf of the people and strongly oppose the president's nomination," Harris said in a statement.


Gregory Krieg (CNN) on September 26, 2020 wrote:
(CNN)Democrats on Saturday night launched their case against federal Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, saying support for her confirmation was equivalent to a vote to end the Affordable Care Act.

In a rush of statements following Barrett's Rose Garden introduction, top Democrats put the fate of the law -- and its popular protections for patients with pre-existing conditions -- front and center. They also made frequent reference to the coronavirus pandemic, and the chaos that could arise from stripping health insurance options from millions of Americans in its midst.

From the Democratic presidential ticket on down, criticism of Barrett repeatedly circled back to what has been a political winner for the party: health care -- and the backlash to Republican efforts to dismantle the ACA, former President Barack Obama's signature policy achievement.

"President Trump has been trying to throw out the Affordable Care Act for four years. Republicans have been trying to end it for a decade. Twice, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the law as constitutional," Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, Obama's vice president, said in a statement. "But even now, in the midst of a global health pandemic, the Trump Administration is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the entire law, including its protections for people with pre-existing conditions."



1960 Was The Year

John F. Kennedy defeated incumbent Vice President Richard Nixon in 1960 to become the 35th President of the United States of America (1961-1963), the youngest man ever elected to the Presidency who was also a Catholic.  

In 1960, I was 13 years old and my staunch Democratic Parents demanded that my sister, brother, and I be present at dinner unless my father was away on a business trip.  The Kennedy win was a topic of conversation at dinner since my parents viewed him contemptuously and stated often that our President was going to be controlled by the Catholic Church which they also found distasteful but I never knew why or I cannot remember why they felt this way if they had, in fact, said something...  but, as far as Kennedy was concerned, I do remember because my mother forced me to read PROFILES IN COURAGE...  which was interesting because while she wanted me to know about courageous people she DID NOT WANT me to be courageous myself...  because of all the negative attention that would be directed towards her...  at least, that is what I believed.

At 72 years of age, I look back at 1960 and wonder why my DEMOCRATIC PARENTS who were very religious themselves did not support the Catholic Church, especially when the Catholic Church is referenced in the APOSTLES CREED which is the cornerstone of the United Methodist Church's beliefs and is chanted every Sunday in Church.

My parents raised all their children in the United Methodist Church.


Both my parents are dead now and I am somewhat of a composite of both their teachings and influences but I do not share their contempt for the Catholic Church, nor do I support the Democratic Party which has shifted too far to the left for me.  In fact, I don't believe that I ever really supported the Democratic Party since Kennedy's assassination.  Except for Jimmy Carter, I have never really been able to TRUST any of them, especially since they do not practice what they preached.



This is What Catholics Believe...

The chief teachings of the Catholic church are: 
  1. God's objective existence
  2. God's interest in individual human beings, who can enter into relations with God (through prayer)
  3. the Trinity
  4. the divinity of Jesus
  5. the immortality of the soul of each human being, each one being accountable at death for his or her actions in life, with the award of heaven or hell 
  6. the resurrection of the dead; the historicity of the Gospels;
  7. the divine commission of the church
  8. the Roman Catholic Church stresses that since the members, living and dead, share in each other's merits, the Virgin Mary and other saints and the dead in purgatory are never forgotten

To belong to the church one must accept as factually true the gospel of Jesus as handed down in tradition and as interpreted by the bishops in union with the pope. Fundamental in this divine tradition is the Bible , its text determined and disseminated by the church. Adherents must also accept the church as possessing the fullness of revelation, and the church, according to the Roman Catholic catechism, is the only Christian body that is one, holy, catholic [universal], and apostolic.

The doctrine of apostolic succession is one of the keystones of the Catholic faith; it holds that the pope (the vicar of Christ) and the bishops have in varying degrees the spiritual authority Jesus assigned to his apostles. The voice of the pope, either alone or in conjunction with his bishops in council, is regarded as infallible when speaking on matters of faith and morals taught in common with the bishops (see infallibility ). Many features of the traditional teaching (dogma) have been analyzed and restated, by the councils and by great theologians (see council, ecumenical ; creed ; Thomas Aquinas, Saint ; Trent, Council of ; Vatican Council, First ; Vatican Council, Second ).   SOURCEThe Roman Catholic Church

Consider this...

 HOW HAS BLACK LIVES MATTER MADE BLACK LIVES BETTER?


Please list all that apply:

1.  

2.

3.

4.

5.


Can't think of anything... except maybe,

Defunding the police and

Killing white cops...

No GAY Gene in Our DNA

The largest study to date on the genetic basis of sexuality has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual behavior — but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s sexuality.

The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviors.

“There is no ‘gay gene’,” says lead study author Andrea Ganna, a geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Ganna and his colleagues also used the analysis to estimate that up to 25% of sexual behavior can be explained by genetics, with the rest influenced by environmental and cultural factors — a figure similar to the findings of smaller studies.

“This is a solid study,” says Melinda Mills, a sociologist at the University of Oxford, UK, who studies the genetic basis of reproductive behaviors.

But she cautions that the results may not be representative of the overall population — a limitation that the study authors acknowledge. The lion’s share of the genomes comes from the UK Biobank research program and the consumer-genetics company 23andMe, based in Mountain View, California. The people who contribute their genetic and health information to those databases are predominantly of European ancestry and are on the older side. UK Biobank participants were between 40 and 70 years old when their data were collected, and the median age for people in 23andMe’s database is 51.

The study authors also point out that they followed convention for genetic analyses by dropping from their study people whose biological sex and self-identified gender did not match. As a result, the work doesn’t include sexual and gender minorities (the LGBTQ community) such as transgender people and intersex people.  TO READ ENTIRE ARTICLE, CLICK HERE...

Our FAITH is CORRECT but WRONG: Trinity Part I of III

Let's start our PILGRIMAGE with our Universe.

Our Solar System is in the Milky Way Galaxy.  Our Solar System is, according to NASA:  In the furthest reaches of the Solar System is the Oort Cloud; a theorized cloud of icy objects that could orbit the Sun to a distance of 100,000 astronomical units, or 1.87 light-years.  

The Milky Way is about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 km (about 100,000 light years or about 30 kpc) across. The Sun does not lie near the center of our Galaxy.  According to most scientists, it would take us about 37,200 years to go one light-year.

That's 372 centuries...

How many galaxies in the known universe?

ABOUT 200 billion galaxies...

AND...

God created it all...

at least according to our FAITH, GOD created it all.

BUT...  what faith is that?

  • Christianity
  • Islam
  • Buddhism
  • Judaism

According to the World Wide Web, there are some 4,300 religions of the world. This is according to Adherents, an independent, non-religiously affiliated organization that monitors the number and size of the world's religions.

Did God allow all those religions to be created?

If Christians believe that God allowed mankind to create Christianity because of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, then why isn't it possible for God to have allowed other religions to be created because of something or other?

Logically, it is entirely possible... and, to argue otherwise is completely illogical and is following the same illogic when people believe that mankind is the only race of people in God's CREATED UNIVERSE...

Why would our GOD create a universe SO LARGE and then only create MANKIND to live in one solar system of one galaxy out of an estimated 200 billion galaxies?

Do you see the illogical nature of believing otherwise?

Out of those 4,300 religions in the world today, there are only 12 Major Religions.

These 12 Major religions are:
  1. Christianity
  2. Islam
  3. Hinduism
  4. Buddhism
  5. Sikhism
  6. Taoism
  7. Judaism
  8. Confucianism
  9. Bahá'í
  10. Shinto
  11. Jainism
  12. Zoroastrianism
Now that we have established that there are 12 Major Religions in the world today, we can continue with Part II next Sunday.

Komic Korner Kartoons

 









Saturday, September 26

Saturdays are Peaceful

                                          
Even though I am retired and cannot really tell one day from the next day, SATURDAYS are still special in that they remain, at least for me, peaceful...  that is to say that Saturdays reflect the end of a week's worth of labor and one can relax and simply enjoy the SLOW-PACED unfolding day...  and, while Sundays are another day off...  they are different because the next day we return to work whereas with Saturdays we still have another day off...

SATURDAYS for me are days of reflection, pondering what I cannot understand or will ever know, sitting on the porch witnessing the activities of my community neighbors (which is nothing done outside) and watching the animals, especially the rabbits and birds that enjoy safety and security on my property.

Spring, Summer, and Fall SATURDAYS are spent on the back screened-in porch contemplating the benefits and frustrations of still being alive in today's AMERICA...  an AMERICA that is divided along several lines of political ideologies and philosophies which has little to do with LIFE's PURPOSE...  at least as I see it.

Life is about LIFE which is about living and living is about appreciate and gratitude and that revolves around one's being given life (birth) and whether we wanted life or not is meaningless and irrelevant since life is what we have.

In other words, I did not REQUEST that I be given life via birth from my mother and yet, life is nonetheless what I have received; consequently, I am grateful for that life and appreciative for what that life has allowed me to SEE...  EXPERIENCE...  and DOUBT...

  • We have not been designed (???) to live a long time.
  • We have not been designed to live without food or oxygen.
  • We have not been designed to want the same things.
  • We have not been designed to think the same way.
  • We have not been designed to serve each other.
  • We have been designed to procreate.

WHY?

It seems inconceivable and illogical that human beings simply EVOLVED into what we are today and it seems inconceivable and illogical that we should only live 8 decades +/- and then we simply die and
it seems inconceivable and illogical that we have been given free will and choice during our lives but had no free will or choice with our births and deaths outside of suicides...  and yet, this is exactly what has taken place with our lives and with our living of those lives.

BUT, regardless of these inconsistencies, most of us do not appear to be appreciate of our own lives or the lives of our friends and neighbors and potential enemies and those we do not yet know or will never know...  and yet, WE ALL HAVE BEEN GIVEN LIFE.
  • manufacturing of HATE also evolve inside of us over the years?
  • Did the inability to show appreciation or gratitude evolve inside of us over the years?
  • Did the desire to acquire wealth, position, and power evolve inside of us over the years?

SATURDAYS for me are days of reflection and pondering...  and, in so doing I am filled with an inner peace inside even though there is turmoil all around me.





Herschel Walker accuses Democrats of denouncing violence 'yet you don't really mean it'

       
Democratic political leaders have given token statements denouncing violence and rioting in cities across America, but have failed to take meaningful action, former NFL running back Herschel Walker told "The Story" Friday night.

"It's not [a] peaceful [protest] when they say you have got to disperse," Walker told host Jon Scott in response to reports of a third night of unrest in Louisville following a grand jury decision in the Breonna Taylor case. "It means you have got to go home, [but] they didn't go home. They moved to another place."

Walker, who won the 1982 Heisman Trophy as a junior at the University of Georgia and who addressed the Republican National Convention last month, added that "every governor should be punished who is going to let people be injured because there is not a peaceful protest when you have police officers that were shot earlier.

"We need law and order right now in the United States of America.  Walker added that all Americans, regardless of race, want to live in a peaceful and orderly society, and even though he doesn't like to "call out" political parties, Democrats need to "start doing their job."

"They say you can denounce violence and the riots," he said. "You can denounce it, but yet you really don't mean it. If you really mean it, you have to tell the people this is unlawful.  TO READ FULL STORY, CLICK HERE...


THIS and THAT











Thursday, September 24

Native American Advice and/or Philosophy


 

Lending A Helpful Hand...


 

Scent Dogs

 Background

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread, early, ideally real-time, identification of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is pivotal in interrupting infection chains. Volatile organic compounds produced during respiratory infections can cause specific scent imprints, which can be detected by trained dogs with a high rate of precision.

Methods
Eight detection dogs were trained for 1 week to detect saliva or tracheobronchial secretions of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients in a randomized, double-blinded and controlled study.

Results
The dogs were able to discriminate between samples of infected (positive) and non-infected (negative) individuals with average diagnostic sensitivity of 82.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.02–83.24%) and specificity of 96.35% (95% CI: 96.31–96.39%). During the presentation of 1012 randomized samples, the dogs achieved an overall average detection rate of 94% (±3.4%) with 157 correct indications of positive, 792 correct rejections of negative, 33 incorrect indications of negative or incorrect rejections of 30 positive sample presentations.

Conclusions
These preliminary findings indicate that trained detection dogs can identify respiratory secretion samples from hospitalized and clinically diseased SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals by discriminating between samples from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and negative controls. This data may form the basis for the reliable screening method of SARS-CoV-2 infected people.  >>>TO READ ENTIRE ARTICLE, CLICK HERE...