MANKIND and Religion

FROM GENESIS

The Sixth Day
…26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness, to rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it.” 

27So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and every creature that crawls upon the earth.”…

Here is the FIRST PROBLEM... the use of LET US...  the way this is used indicate plural or more than one.  So, who is this God referring to?  I suppose the logical conclusion is that he is talking about, God, the Son, and the Holy Ghost...  if that is true, then plural is the right way to phrase this.

This also suggests that God, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost are identical in appearance...   that is to say, with no deviations at all...  even the slightest deviation could alter the physical appearance of man.

Here is also the SECOND PROBLEM...  mankind is not identical to each other outside of the organs inside the body.

• Different hair color
• Different sking tones
• Different physical beauty
• Different color eyes
• Different height and width
• Different intelligence
• Different physical abilities
• Different genders (male/female)

SO...  is God male or female?  is Jesus male or female?  is the holy ghost male or female?

Which image did God take?

NOTE:  if the Bible is to be a learning tool and a guide, why does it have this discrepancy?

1. Does God have red, black, or yellow hair?
2. Is God short or tall... thin or fat?
3. What color eyes does God have?

If this three points are meaningless and should be ignored, in WHAT LIKENESS did God make man?

And, in what likeness did God make woman?  especially since she is physically different than man.

Many religious scholars would have us ignore or disregard these issues as they have little to do with having belief in God and hope/faith in Jesus...  however, I say that it does make a difference as it goes to the Bible's CREDIBILITY...  If it is confusing or unclear on these points, what other points might be just as unclear...  like how long has CREATION been in existence?

The Bible says 6,000 years.

Scientists say that the universe is billions of years old.

WHO IS CORRECT?

And does this lack of accuracy impact LIFE AFTER DEATH?

Zion National Park

 

It's Mothers Day

Mother’s Day, holiday in honour of mothers that is celebrated in countries throughout the world. In its modern form the holiday originated in the United States, where it is observed on the second Sunday in May. Many other countries also celebrate the holiday on this date, while some mark the observance at other times of the year. 

During the Middle Ages the custom developed of allowing those who had moved away to visit their home parishes and their mothers on Laetare Sunday, the fourth Sunday of Lent. This became Mothering Sunday in Britain, where it continued into modern times, although it has largely been replaced by Mother’s Day.

Anna Jarvis of Philadelphia, whose mother had organized women’s groups to promote friendship and health, originated Mother’s Day. On May 12, 1907, she held a memorial service at her late mother’s church in Grafton, West Virginia. Within five years virtually every state was observing the day, and in 1914 U.S. Pres. Woodrow Wilson made it a national holiday. 

Although Jarvis had promoted the wearing of a white carnation as a tribute to one’s mother, the custom developed of wearing a red or pink carnation to represent a living mother or a white carnation for a mother who was deceased. Over time the day was expanded to include others, such as grandmothers and aunts, who played mothering roles. 

What had originally been primarily a day of honor became associated with the sending of cards and the giving of gifts, however, and, in protest against its commercialization, Jarvis spent the last years of her life trying to abolish the holiday she had brought into being.

Festivals honoring mothers and mother goddesses date to ancient times. The Phrygians held a festival for Cybele, the Great Mother of the Gods, as did the Greeks for the goddess Rhea. Likewise, the Romans adapted the practice to their own pantheon. Some countries have continued to observe ancient festivals; for example, Durga-puja, honoring the goddess Durga, remains an important festival in India.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

This article was most recently revised and updated by Amy Tikkanen.

Mothers Day

 

Mumford & Sons

 

Small Nuclear Reactor - Powers 300,000 Homes

US tech company, Westinghouse, has announced the launch of the AP300, a smaller version of its flagship AP1000 nuclear reactor, in an effort to extend access to nuclear power as demand for clean energy rises.

The AP300 nuclear reactor is scheduled to be operational in 2027 and will provide roughly one-third of the power of the flagship AP1000 reactor, according to an official press release by the firm on Thursday.

"The AP300 is the only small modular reactor offering available that is based on deployed, operating, and advanced reactor technology," President and CEO of Westinghouse, Patrick Fragman, said in the statement.

"The launch of the AP300 SMR rounds out the Westinghouse portfolio of reactor technology, allowing us to deliver on the full needs of our customers globally, with a clear line of sight on schedule of delivery, and economics."

Westinghouse's decision marks a significant turning point in the nuclear industry's effort to reinvent itself in response to climate change.

Nuclear fission reactor electricity produces no greenhouse gas emissions, and smaller nuclear reactors are less expensive to develop.

The AP300 is expected to cost around $1 billion per unit, compared to the AP1000's anticipated cost of $6.8 billion.

It will produce about 300 megawatts of electricity, compared to the AP1000's 1,200 megawatts, and power about 300,000 households.  READ MORE...

Current Events

 

EVs and Hybrids

 There is a HUGE push inside the current liberal administration to do away with FOSSILS FUELS...  which includes petroleum crude oil and natural gas...  the idea is that we GO GREEN and get all our energy from WIND<>SOLAR<>HYDRO.  That sounds simple enough but we do not have all the natural resources to do this inside the continental United States.

WHO HAS THESE NATURAL RESOURCES?

Did you guess CHINA?

If you did, you'd be right.

Additionally, CHINA has all the natural resouces to make EV Batteries for vehicles as well.

However, how much energy does it take to make EV Batteries and will that energy come from FOSSIL FUELS?

A hybrid car is part electric and part gas and may not be as expensive as a totally electric car, but with the hybrid, the cost of replacing the battery is $5-6,000.  Hybrid batteries may last 6-8 years and some say 10.   BUT...  when you replace the battery, you will spend all the money you save, not buying gasoline...

While it may help the environment, it does not help you financially.

The totally EV cars have the same problem with having to replace batteries...  BUT, they are much more expensive and in some cases too expensive for the average American Worker.

The problem with EV cars is going on a vacation and having to stop for a couple of hours to recharge...  providing you can find a charging station that is open.

Currently, we have less that 10% of the charging stations needed to become fully EV.  The charging stations are waiting for the increase in purchases of EVs before they spend the money on charging stations...

What this means is that the charging stations will always LAG  BEHIND the purchasing of EVs...  so, there will never be enough charging stations until the only car on the road is an EV.

There is no telling how long this will take as those who own gasoline cars, ARE NOT GOING TO PURCHASE and EV until they absolutely have to.

INTERESTINGLY, aircraft can only fly on jet fuel that is made from petroleum crude oil.  I doubt we will ever ELIMINATE commercial or military aircraft.  I doubt that millionaires and billionaires will ever give up their private jets...

REMEMBER.....  DO AS I SAY NOT AS I DO!!!

REMEMBER...

only 1% of the population is ultra wealthy

only 10% of the population is super weathly

only 20% of the population is wealthy

THIS MEANS that 80% does not earn much money, nor do they have a large savings account

EVs and HYBRIDS are trypically for the 20%...  NOT YOU!!!

Something Funny

 

Climate Tipping Point

With climate-enhanced droughts, heatwaves and fires ravaging three continents and the threat of a new surge in global warming, the world urgently needs to ramp-up solutions for slashing carbon pollution. But which solutions are most critical?

The organization Project Drawdown has detailed the potential, feasibility and cost of nearly a hundred climate solutions since it was set up in 2017.

Executive director Jonathan Foley, a leading climate scientist, spoke to AFP about how to assess and prioritize the actions needed to keep Earth liveable.

The following interview has been edited for length and flow:

Q: What are the three most important questions in assessing the usefulness and integrity of carbon-cutting solutions?

A: Is it available now and ready to deploy? Because we need to start bending the emissions curve immediately.

Is it cost-effective? Otherwise, it's not going to scale effectively.

Does it create co-benefits for people, especially in terms of health, jobs, equity, and justice? This will make it far more appealing.

Q: A lot of hope—and investment—is going into technological solutions such as filtering fossil fuel pollution or pulling CO2 out of the air. Comment?

A: While some very limited carbon removal will be needed by mid-century, the vast, vast majority of the work we need to do—more than 95 percent—is cutting emissions, and doing it now.

Of the five percent focused on carbon removal, I think it should be more than 90 percent nature-based removal, such as ecological restoration and regenerative agriculture. Machine-based removal is unlikely to work at any meaningful scale.

Q: We often hear that solutions are already available, all that's missing is political will. Is that it?  READ MORE...

Kingston Trio

 

Iceland

 

Artificial Intelligence Needs Oversight

EVERY TIME YOU post a photo, respond on social media, make a website, or possibly even send an email, your data is scraped, stored, and used to train generative AI technology that can create text, audio, video, and images with just a few words. 

This has real consequences: OpenAI researchers studying the labor market impact of their language models estimated that approximately 80 percent of the US workforce could have at least 10 percent of their work tasks affected by the introduction of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, while around 19 percent of workers may see at least half of their tasks impacted. 

We’re seeing an immediate labor market shift with image generation, too. In other words, the data you created may be putting you out of a job.

When a company builds its technology on a public resource—the internet—it’s sensible to say that that technology should be available and open to all. But critics have noted that GPT-4 lacked any clear information or specifications that would enable anyone outside the organization to replicate, test, or verify any aspect of the model. 

Some of these companies have received vast sums of funding from other major corporations to create commercial products. For some in the AI community, this is a dangerous sign that these companies are going to seek profits above public benefit.Code transparency alone is unlikely to ensure that these generative AI models serve the public good. 

There is little conceivable immediate benefit to a journalist, policy analyst, or accountant (all “high exposure” professions according to the OpenAI study) if the data underpinning an LLM is available. We increasingly have laws, like the Digital Services Act, that would require some of these companies to open their code and data for expert auditor review. 

And open source code can sometimes enable malicious actors, allowing hackers to subvert safety precautions that companies are building in. Transparency is a laudable objective, but that alone won’t ensure that generative AI is used to better society.     READ MORE...

Fifth Dimension

 

AI & Your Job

 Artificial Intellignece is moving like a California wildfire moving through a dry National Forest.  It is only fitting that California be the first state where the workers get replaced by AI...  especially since Silicon  Valley is the birthplace of AI.

Some experts say the big employee screw job will come around 2030 while others say that because AI is progressing faster than planned, we will see dramatic changes n the workforce as early as 2025.  These experts are saying that 60-80% of jobs could be replaced in the next 2-3 years.

Actually, I think that is good news for most Americans because my wife and I have been retired since 2015 (7.5 years) and we really like the fact that we don't have to go to work and can do damn near anything we want.

The minor downside to all this losing your job shit, will depend on how capable the US government is of paying employment benefits and for how long.

The other good news is that with all these illegal immigrants coming across the border, they will do the work that Americans don't want to do.  You don't need to speak English to pick fruits and veges and you damn sure don't need to speak English to clean motel rooms and public restrooms.

However, the liberals say that there will be plenty of jobs making windmills and solar panels and if you know your way around a frigging vehicle, you will be able to build EVs...  Of course, if people lose their jobs due to AI, I wonder how many EVs will be sold?

Still, is is something FOR WHICH TO HOPE IF YOU LOSE YOUR JOB...

Are you familiar with EQUITY EMPLOYMENT???It is a concept that the liberals are pushing to hire BLACKS before WHITES, because they have been at a disadvantage in this country since slavery.  EQUITY will not just take place for employment but it will take place for healthcare services as well.  NO MORE TRIAGE!!!  They don't give a shit how sick you are, blacks go before whites.

Liberal DAs want to stop prosecuting Blacks and start prosecuting Whites so that there will be more whites incarated than blacks...  Of course, I would think the type of crime would make a difference...  but, from what I have read, it does not matter...  just the color of your skin.

If I was a WHITE DUDE, married to a WHITE WIFE with WHITE CHILDREN, I think I would be trying to save as much money as I could over the next two years.

Black Sea

 

Will BRICS be Successful?

Veteran investor Jon Wolfenbarger says that the success of BRICS could have serious effects on the US dollar and the living standards of Americans.

Wolfenbarger, a former investment banker at JPMorgan and Allianz, writes in a new article for the Mises Institute that throughout history, all empires have ultimately failed, and the US likely won’t be an exception.

He says that BRICS nations, which refers to the economic coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, now have the power to dethrone the US after decades of irresponsible economic policy by the American government.

Says Wolfenbarger,

“If the BRICS are successful and the US does not change its policies to focus on a stronger dollar, less spending, and peace instead of war, it is possible the dollar will slowly lose its ‘reserve currency’ status.

This would hurt US living standards and lead to less power for the US government, similar to the weakening of the UK after World War II. All empires in history have failed, and the US will not likely be an exception – if the BRICS can create a successful hard currency to compete with the dollar.”

The investor, who founded investment research service Bull And Bear Profits, says that BRICS nations still have a big hill to climb if they’re serious about competing with the greenback.

According to Wolfenbarger, the BRICS can forget about taking the USD’s hegemony if it plans on creating another fiat currency that is created out of thin air.

“The US has the largest and safest government bond market, no capital controls, and a reputation for enforcing the rule of law. By contrast, the BRICS countries are hardly known for respecting laws or having strong currencies.

Perhaps more importantly, non-US entities have $12 trillion of US dollar-denominated debt that they need to pay back with dollars, so abandoning the dollar would be incredibly difficult and costly.”

Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get crypto email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Telegram

Flowing Fish

 

Almost

 

AI Needs to be REGULATED

For most of the past decade, public concerns about digital technology have focused on the potential abuse of personal data. People were uncomfortable with the way companies could track their movements online, often gathering credit card numbers, addresses, and other critical information. They found it creepy to be followed around the web by ads that had clearly been triggered by their idle searches, and they worried about identity theft and fraud.

Those concerns led to the passage of measures in the United States and Europe guaranteeing internet users some level of control over their personal data and images—most notably, the European Union’s 2018 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

Of course, those measures didn’t end the debate around companies’ use of personal data. Some argue that curbing it will hamper the economic performance of Europe and the United States relative to less restrictive countries, notably China, whose digital giants have thrived with the help of ready, lightly regulated access to personal information of all sorts. (Recently, however, the Chinese government has started to limit the digital firms’ freedom—as demonstrated by the large fines imposed on Alibaba.) 

Others point out that there’s plenty of evidence that tighter regulation has put smaller European companies at a considerable disadvantage to deeper-pocketed U.S. rivals such as Google and Amazon.

But the debate is entering a new phase. As companies increasingly embed artificial intelligence in their products, services, processes, and decision-making, attention is shifting to how data is used by the software—particularly by complex, evolving algorithms that might diagnose a cancer, drive a car, or approve a loan. 

The EU, which is again leading the way (in its 2020 white paper “On Artificial Intelligence—A European Approach to Excellence and Trust” and its 2021 proposal for an AI legal framework), considers regulation to be essential to the development of AI tools that consumers can trust.  READ MORE...